General NewsBiden pushing to arm Ukraine with powerful JASSM missiles

Biden pushing to arm Ukraine with powerful JASSM missiles

AGM-158 JASSM; illustrative photo
AGM-158 JASSM; illustrative photo
Images source: © Getty Images | ewg3D
Łukasz Michalik

8:14 AM EDT, September 4, 2024, updated: 1:14 PM EDT, September 4, 2024

According to Reuters, the Biden administration is close to approving the decision to supply Ukraine with JASSM missiles. This weapon's use on the frontline could significantly impact the course of the conflict. We explain which other equipment had similarly significant implications for the war's outcome.

Reuters reported on the planned supply of AGM-158 JASSM missiles to Ukraine, citing unofficial sources in the U.S. administration. Although the decision has not yet been formally approved, President Biden wants to deliver the missiles to Ukraine.

According to Reuters sources, transferring the new weapons could take several months, during which the administration needs to resolve "technical problems" related to the delivery. The missiles would be used with the F-16 aircraft already supplied to Ukraine.

AGM-158 JASSM is a modern cruise missile with a range of approximately 186 miles for the basic version and over 621 miles for the JASSM-ER variant. An essential advantage of the weapon is its stealth characteristics, making it difficult to detect and combat. In the basic version, its significant advantage is the warhead weight – with the total missile weight exceeding 2,205 lbs, the warhead weighs as much as 1,000 lbs.

The JASSM-ER variant's warhead weight is smaller, but its range is over 621 miles. To increase the range while maintaining the missile's dimensions and weight, the combat load was reduced in favor of additional fuel.

After supplying JASSM missiles to Ukraine, Kyiv will gain new capabilities to attack targets on the Russian rear. However, this weapon's actual significance depends on politics and the restrictions imposed on Kyiv regarding the freedom to use long-range Western armaments.

Guided artillery shells

One of the key weapons in the early days of the conflict turned out to be guided artillery shells. At the beginning of the war, Ukraine had a stockpile of Kvintyk shells developed and produced by its own industry. Laser-guided 152 mm shells were used in the first critical days of the war to repel Russian forces moving toward Kyiv.

After exhausting its own guided artillery ammunition, Ukraine began using captured Russian 30F39 Krasnopol shells. Ukrainian armed forces also received guided artillery shells of Western production – M982 Excalibur.

Excaliburs – fired from Polish Krab self-propelled howitzers – made a very successful debut. Initially, their accuracy was estimated at an impressive 70 percent, and single shells successfully destroyed Russian tanks at a range of dozens of miles.

However, due to Russian countermeasures, the effectiveness of this weapon quickly began to decrease. GPS signal jamming caused the accuracy of Excalibur shells to drop to about 6 percent within just a few weeks.

This is particularly severe for a guided shell because, due to the necessity of incorporating guidance and control systems into the shell, the combat load it carries is smaller than that of unguided shells. Even a small increase in miss distance significantly reduces the chances of destroying the target in such cases.

M142 HIMARS – the nemesis of the Russian rear

The M142 HIMARS launchers were also very significant. The appearance of this weapon on the frontline, along with GMLRS missiles with a range of up to 50 miles, temporarily paralyzed Russian logistics. Shelling of frontline warehouses forced the Russians to move them to a deeper rear, significantly affecting the capabilities of the units fighting against Ukraine.

Over time, the effectiveness of HIMARS – though it remains a formidable weapon – began to decrease. This is because Russians are effectively and on a large scale using electronic warfare, one manifestation being the jamming of GPS satellite signals.

Without satellite navigation, the missile is still guided – it uses dead reckoning navigation (inertial navigation). The guidance system can approximately determine the position relative to a known coordinate target based on data about its speed, flight direction, and many other factors. However, this method is less accurate, significantly reducing the effectiveness of shelling using GMLRS missiles.

Naval drones – David vs. Goliath

The naval part of Ukraine's war will go down in military history: a state without a navy managed to resist and then force the retreat of the Russian Black Sea Fleet.

In the early period of the war, the Russian Black Sea Fleet – despite suffering losses – successfully carried out its task, conducting a naval blockade of Ukraine; over time, this situation changed.

Ukraine virtually does not have a navy – even the corvettes ordered from Turkey – for security reasons – sailed under the Turkish flag during sea trials. Despite this, it managed to threaten the Black Sea Fleet thanks to naval drones.

Naval drone attacks, combined with the use of Storm Shadow missiles and SCALP-EG, made Sevastopol and Crimea no longer safe places for Russian ships. To protect their units, Russia was forced to withdraw most of them to ports on the eastern shore of the Black Sea.

See also