Trump's inflated Ukraine aid claims spark global backlash
President Donald Trump has repeatedly claimed over the past months that the United States allocated between $300 billion and $350 billion to aid Ukraine, which he says is three times more than Europe’s contributions. However, experts indicate that this amount is more than double the actual U.S. aid value, and Europe has, in reality, provided more resources than Trump's assertions suggest, with only one-third offered as loans.
"The United States has provided Ukraine with much more aid than any other country—hundreds of billions of dollars. We spent over $300 billion, while Europe spent about $100 billion. That's a big difference," Trump stated on February 24 during a meeting with French President Emmanuel Macron.
This version of the statement—sometimes quoted by Trump as $350 billion—has been reiterated dozens, if not hundreds, of times during his election campaign and after assuming office. He often criticized his predecessor, Joe Biden, suggesting he was "stupid" for not demanding a "settlement" from Europe. Recently, Trump also began alleging that, unlike U.S. aid, Europe's assistance to Ukraine is given as loans.
Exaggerated US aid
While the aid given to Ukraine can be calculated in several ways, it is clear that the $300-$350 billion mentioned by Trump at least doubles the actual aid amount from the U.S. This figure is significant because, in Trump's narrative, it justifies the need to "recover" the given funds through a mineral resources agreement.
The Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW) estimates the value of U.S. military, financial, and humanitarian aid at $118.3 billion. In contrast, the aid of the EU and European nations totals $145 billion, of which 35% is in the form of loans.
According to the Pentagon, the U.S. has committed $65.9 billion in military equipment to Ukraine. Furthermore, Congress allocated $30 billion for direct budget support to Ukraine and nearby countries, and the Treasury Department granted Kyiv $20 billion in loans, repayable from profits generated by frozen Russian assets.
The IfW figures are one way to present the support value. The U.S. Inspector General overseeing aid spending reports that Congress has allocated $182 billion (with $83 billion spent so far) for the crisis response in Ukraine. However, this sum includes expenses that do not flow directly to Ukraine; half was used to purchase equipment for U.S. forces and to bolster U.S. presence in Europe. Calculating European aid similarly would significantly increase its perceived value.
Trump's calculations
And what about the $350 billion? The White House has not responded to repeated inquiries about the source of this statistic. While there are theories regarding its origin—an EU diplomat mentioned that one theory suggested the figure represents total U.S. security expenditures in Europe—it remains uncertain.
Trump's claims were rarely publicly corrected until Monday, when Macron pointed out that, in reality, Europe bears 60% of the expenditure supporting Ukraine.
"If you believe that, that's fine with me," Trump replied. Three days later, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer similarly corrected the American President, who falsely claimed that most of Europe’s aid to Ukraine was in loans. Starmer clarified that most aid is in grants, with a $50 billion loan, repayable from interests yielded by frozen Russian Central Bank assets, granted collectively by the U.S., the EU, and other G7 countries. The U.S. is responsible for $20 billion of this amount.
Trump holds firm
Despite interventions from Macron and Starmer, Trump has not ceased repeating these fictional figures.
The issue of Trump's and Republicans' false narrative regarding the alleged support disparity for Ukraine has been a longstanding frustration for European diplomats and politicians. Polish and European representatives in Washington often emphasize their intent to inform their colleagues about the EU's involvement. The EU Representation in Washington has distributed informational packages on European support to Republican congress members in 2023 and 2024. Though some Ukraine supporters within the Republican Party have since publicly acknowledged Europe’s real contribution, Trump and many of his supporters persist with their narrative—even after public corrections from Macron and Starmer.
The fictitious amount of American aid cited by Trump exemplifies his tendency to ignore facts, often citing false figures and statistics concerning the war in Ukraine and other topics. Trump routinely claims that "millions" have died in Ukraine (estimates suggest the number of casualties, both military and civilian, is in the hundreds of thousands) and fluctuates on the loss numbers for both sides.
He also inflates statistics regarding U.S. trade balances, such as doubling the deficit with the EU, and referring to nonexistent $200 billion "subsidies" to Canada, despite the actual U.S. trade deficit with Canada being about $50 billion.
Fake information
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky suggested on Friday that false details shared by Trump and Vice President J.D. Vance about the Ukraine war were part of the reason for Friday’s conflict in the Oval Office. Zelensky mentioned to Fox News that he frequently discussed this issue with American representatives.
"When you talk about numbers, every person is important. When you talk about a million losses, we don't have a million losses. When you talk about territories, maybe some territories, etc. These are not just territories, these are homes. These are people's lives, you know," he added.
Trump’s continual use of fictional statistics and dismissive stance on the truth present challenges for journalists reporting on his actions and comments.
A correspondent for a major American newspaper noted that the individual tends to speak impulsively, attempting to shape his version of reality. This creates challenges in reporting, as it is impossible to ignore statements made by the President of the United States. At the same time, ensuring readers understand that his remarks do not always align with reality. The journalist added that constantly correcting falsehoods would consume a significant portion of any article.